Getting folks to read your blog. March 3, 2010
Posted by ourfriendben in Ben Franklin, homesteading, wit and wisdom.Tags: blog readership, blogging, blogs, how to get people to read your blog, Mr. Subjunctive, Plants Are the Strangest People, successful blogs, WordPress
trackback
Our friend Ben was heading over to our blog, Poor Richard’s Almanac, this morning when my attention was caught like a moth in a flame by a blog post on our blog host, WordPress’s, home page. WordPress has any number of great features, but one that always turns our friend Ben green with envy is its featured blogs section. Every day, the home page showcases a number of blog posts that the WordPress factotums think merit readership. Much like Oprah’s Book Club back in the day, doubtless being featured on this roster is a really, really good way to attract readers to your blog. (Sigh.) But I digress.
Today, two posts caught my eye: One was called something like “Weird uses for leather” and showed a photo of a pig who, under the circumstances, didn’t strike our friend Ben as looking sufficiently concerned. Wishing the pig well, but having no desire to actually read the post, I scanned the other featured posts and came upon something to the effect of “How to use WordPress to attract a zillion readers to your blog.” (Apparently, using the name “WordPress” in the title works pretty damn well.) Naturally, our friend Ben, modest soul that I am, would love to attract a zillion readers to our blog, Poor Richard’s Almanac. (And no, Silence, of course this has nothing to do with my unending attempts to attract the attention of the MacArthur Fellowship nominators.) So, like the hapless moth, our friend Ben found myself clicking on the post.
What did I read there? Bad news and good news. The blogger said that, in order to attract readership, you simply had to be on Twitter and Facebook ranting on (and on) about your blog. (Luddites that we are here at PRA, forget that.) You had to inundate all your friends, relatives, coworkers, and acquaintances with “news” about and links to your blog. (Mercifully, I only know one person who actually does this. And it’s so irritating.) And you absolutely, absolutely had to include photos in your posts, or your blog was doomed. You’d be lucky to attract 3, much less 30, readers a day.
We here at Poor Richard’s Almanac beg to differ. Not because we disagree with this advice as a basic template. It’s all pretty sound advice. But rather because it’s a template, not a mandate.
As noted, we use neither Facebook nor Twitter. We find that we have enough to do writing our blog, answering and sending e-mail, doing our work, and living our lives, without adding yet more time-eaters like tweeting and texting and posting to Facebook. But that doesn’t mean we discount their utility as tools. If our blog was commercial in nature, or if our jobs or businesses required it, you can bet we’d be tweeting away like mad and asking everyone on earth to “friend us on Facebook.” Thank God we don’t have to.
As for annoying our friends and relations with endless begging, screaming e-mails and the like about how great our blog is and how they should all be reading it, we’d say to go for the happy medium. Yes, tell everyone you’d want to read your blog that you’ve started it, what it’s about, and that you’d love to get their feedback. And please provide a link! Then sit back and wait for none of them to actually read it, at least for a very long time. Our friend Ben and Silence Dogood were dismayed that so few of our family and friends tuned in to Poor Richard’s Almanac when we and Richard Saunders launched it in 2008. OFB’s brother and one of our good friends were faithful readers, but of all our families and closest friends, that was pretty much it. Hundreds of readers checked in faithfully, but not the folks who were nearest and dearest to us in the face-to-face sense. Many of these announced very self-righteously that they didn’t read blogs. Well, fine, your loss. But over time, and without additional annoyance on our parts, we’ve found that more of our friends are joining the group of faithful readers that keeps Poor Richard’s Almanac afloat. We’re always surprised, thrilled, and humbled when another friend joins the flock. But no, we wouldn’t dream of badgering anyone about it. That takes more hubris than we can muster.
Now, about those photos. We have no, absolutely no, argument with this advice. Our observations of the world of blogging suggest that photos are key to transforming your blog into a commercial success, to getting noticed, to getting that book and maybe even that movie deal. We ourselves love seeing photos on other people’s blogs. So why don’t we have any here on Poor Richard’s Almanac? Well, first of all, we’re writers and thinkers, not photographers. Being Luddites, we can’t even take a decent photo, much less upload one to our blog. But second of all, when we started Poor Richard’s Almanac, we set ourselves a challenge. We wanted to see if, like our hero and blog mentor Benjamin Franklin, we could write such compelling posts that readers would come to see what we had to say without visual backup.
So how have we done? Without being celebrities or even recognized authorities in our various fields, being in fact complete unknowns, and without offering visuals or advertising ourselves in any way, Poor Richard’s Almanac attracts hundreds of visitors a day, over 160,000 so far (according to WordPress’s accounting). Not bad for just two years’ postings!
What would we advise for blogging success? Again, we endorse the photographic approach even if we don’t practice it. We also approve of the original post author’s additional suggestions that you write the catchiest possible titles, that you write about things you love, and that you return the favor of visiting bloggers by becoming a regular visitor to (and commentor on) their blogs as well.
But that isn’t all, in our experience, by any means. We think that the greatest success comes from two very disparate approaches. One is to tackle a diverse series of topics that interest you and that, however tangential, will interest others. Whether it’s the age of Dr. Oz, the history of JABO marbles, the nature of Amish Friendship Bread, or if cats ever have brown eyes, this is the approach that has worked for us. People search for what interests them, be it a recipe for pumpkin chili or the best pirate movies or black German shepherd puppies or Pennsylvania Dutch Christmas traditions or the best places to stay in Asheville or how to grow potatoes in containers, and they find themselves on our blog. Our posts seem to be timeless in this respect: We write about what interests us, and when it interests someone else, they come to see what we’ve said about it, be it two minutes or two years after we’ve written it. We find this really awesome.
But there’s a different approach, and that’s tight specialization. When it works, it works far better than our scattershot approach. Look, for example, at Mr. Subjunctive’s blog Plants Are the Strangest People (http://plantsarethestrangestpeople.blogspot.com/). Mr. Subjunctive typically posts about tropicals and houseplants, usually giving their history and nomenclature and often focusing on favorite cultivars and growing techniques. Yes, his blog does digress from time to time, notably on Saturdays when he showcases a photo of his delightful anole, Nina, but he usually stays on-topic and has gained a faithful audience and over 500,000 views as a result.
So yes, we’re here to tell you it can be done. If you want to blog, go for it. But we would like to remind you that “the total look,” text, photos, and illustrative touches, plus a real passion for your subject matter and a flair for great post titles, will get you further faster. Do as we say, not as we do. But thanks for stopping in!




Oh, we have to stay on target, stay the course, and all that jazz? The Deep Middle doesn’t do that. But TDM did get an editor’s attention a while back, but the press decided against the book in the end. He is currently looking for an agent. He started talking in the third person because OFB does that. Contagious. Achoo.
Ha!!! Oh come now, you know that OFB switches schizophrenically from third to first person many times in a single post. It makes readers work even harder to figure out what the hell’s going on, exactly what anyone wants their blog to do! Tell us what kind of book you’d like to write, and maybe we even know an appropriate agent we can recommend. We may be obscure but we try to be helpful here at PRA!
I don’t know about Facebook, though I’m deeply suspicious of its usefulness. I don’t run across much reference to original Facebook content, I don’t have any desire to be barraged with messages about Farmville, and generally when I try to follow a Facebook link, I wind up on a page asking me to sign up for Facebook in order to see whatever it is. If I’m going to put the time into creating original content, I’d like it to be something everybody had access to. (And if I’m not going to be using Facebook to create original content, then I fail to see the point.) And I don’t actually want my old high school friends tracking me down, or getting obsessive about how many “friends” I have, or any of the other crap that appears to go along with it.
I did try Twitter, and . . . well, I found it worse than useless for attracting blog hits,[1] plus I don’t generally have thoughts that can be expressed in under 140 characters, plus something about the eternal-cocktail-party atmosphere of Twitter makes me irritable and angry on a regular enough basis that it was sort of ruining my life. Which I don’t understand how that works, but I was angry often enough then, and not now, that I was forced to conclude that there’s something about Twitter that makes me unreasonably angry.
I don’t think that Twitter is as useless as Facebook, but I don’t think I am temperamentally suited for it. I don’t post anything to it anymore.
For plant-related blog hits, joining Blotanical and/or getting other gardening blogs to link to you is probably better than all the tweeting and facebooking in the world. A completely insane percentage (about 85%) of my blog’s hits come through Google, particularly Google image searches.
-
[1] It didn’t actually get me any hits, and the time I spent tweeting was taking me away from writing the posts, which does get me hits. Therefore worse than useless.
We suspected the same thing about Facebook and Twitter, especially seeing Twitter comments on other people’s blogs, Mr. S. Luddites that we are, we have no way of confirming or denying, but we think your comments are right on. Blotanical has certainly been a godsend to us as well!
half the people that come to my blogs do so because they’re looking up photos and images on Google.
i also watch what people search for to bring them to my blog. that often gives me ideas for what people want to read. for example, i saw that people were looking for “what to plant central texas”, so i wrote a blog about what to plant in March and used tags: what to plant and central texas. i got nearly 100 hits in one day after doing that and half of those were from people looking for what to plant …
Yes, good tips, roundrockgarden! Thanks!!!
My blog wanders around and is generally not topic driven. I also very quickly gave up caring how many people visit. I say what I want about a bunch of things, comment on blogs I like, link to blogs I like, and generally figure if I “build it they will come.” Can’t say I’ve been overwhelmed by people flockin to my blog, but the ones who come usually stay as readers. (I do offend some with my topics, my sporadic writting, and my atrocious spelling, which thins the ranks regularly.) Guess my point is … Why do you care? If you want MORE readers you can get them. But you will have to shape what you do and how you write to attract them. Is it worth it?
On the flip side, sometimes an idea takes off. At NDiN we started a food discussion as a reaction to Food Inc. That turned into a month long challange (this month BTW, you should be contributing!! we need creative real food people!), our second day (yesterday, March 2nd) we had 1500 visits. That’s double our normal readership. I was gobsmacked. Come play, link, enjoy. We’d love to have some real food tips from Silence and Co.
Anyway, write what you feel, write often, and readers be damned.
P.S. I’ve started Twittering (does that make me a Twit?) Not to attract readers but to keep up with a few friends and to say things that bubble up but aren’t worth a whole blog post. Facebook baffels me completely. Tried it. Don’t get it at all.
We do, we do, Alan! (And we love what YOU do, by the way, haven’t even noticed the spelling.) Gods, we’d kill for 1500 readers a day. Wow! We’ll head on over to NDiN and check it all out!
I am a twitter lover, but rarely as a blog promotion. My twittering rounds out all of my interests and allows discussion with gardeners, video gamers, readers, science lovers and beer swillers! Facebook.. bleh. That’s for keeping my mom up to date on my kids!
My blog is pretty humble, but titles and content drive visits for me. I think that the one biggie that you missed here in this write up is frequency. The folks at Poor RIchards Almanac are prolific and consistent writers. Lots of updated content (and especially interesting content) wins. I post (especially in the offseason) very infrequently.
Agree on Blotanical for garden bloggers. A great source of readers for me.
Good points, SJ! The folks we personally know who use Facebook are high school and college kids who post mostly photos of themselves and their friends, and their parents who are trying to keep up. And point well taken re: frequency of posting (and commenting, for that matter).
I come to your blog because of the content which is always interesting, usually informative, and always entertaining and enlightening. I’ve never missed photos on your blog, though there have been times I’d love to have seen a glimpse of a particular recipe, snowscape, autumnscape, etc.
Your writing shines on its own.
Thanks, Nancy!!! We really appreciate that. We wish we could at least post the occasional photo of Shiloh or Linus, but love the simplicity of being able to put our thought and effort into our writing.
Excellent post on this subject, and indeed on many other subjects too. I also saw the “how to get a zillion hits” page (avoiding “Weird uses for leather”) and I think your arguments are far more persuasive.
It’s the quality of the content – whether it’s prose, poetry or photographs – that makes a good blog.
Thank you and welcome, If Nobody Speaks! Your blog is most impressive. I loved the internet stats (and, of course, the “lost pidgeon” sign, oh dear). Too bad Carl Sagan isn’t still alive and spreading his profound message before we’ve wrecked the oceans with our mindless waste and turned our paradise into a wasteland. But thanks for reminding us in his absence!!!
What Nancy said! She did say it so very well! I’ll add that I sure want to see what your sweet puppy looks like and I am curious about Hawk’s Haven! gail
Ha! No photos of Hawk’s Haven until it’s painted, Gail! But I’ll forward you some of sweet Shiloh.
I love reading your blog ~ whether or not you post photos doesn’t matter a whit to me. Your originality and good writing draws me here. When I want to look at photos, I head over to Flickr where I can peruse flower/garden/artsy photos to my heart’s content.
I started using Twitter early on with the intention of tracking what was happening in my garden. When there weren’t many people on Twitter, it was fun & I mostly interacted with good blogging friends. Suddenly there were so many people using it. Like Mr. Subjunctif, I now find myself being generally disgruntled and annoyed and berate myself for even wasting a minute there.
Blotanical is good as a directory to find new blogs, but beyond that ~ well, moving right along. Keep doing what you are doing. I’m getting tired of reading what one should do to ‘grow’ blog readership, to have the best-looking blog, to keep one’s readers satisfied etc. It’s supposed to be an enjoyable activity. (Rant over)
Bless you, Kate! And yes, I still remember your experience with Blotanical, and how your well-deserved popularity caused you so many problems. How dared people berate you for posting on non-gardening topics?! It’s YOUR blog. Sheesh. People sometimes ask us if we’re sorry we post on diverse topics and post as a group, rather than focusing on a single topic and having just one person posting per blog. This amazes us. What we do is fun, and we love it. It’s a pure indulgence, not a burden. We’re so thrilled when anyone joins us in our rants, discoveries, and explorations, or appreciates Silence’s original recipes or commiserates with her epic battles with the evil stinkbugs, or enjoys our friend Ben’s visits with our hero and blog mentor, old Ben Franklin, or gets into Richard Saunders’s posts about history or collectibles. Why would we ever want to be other than we are?!!