jump to navigation

What’s in a name? April 14, 2008

Posted by ourfriendben in Uncategorized, wit and wisdom.
Tags: , , ,
trackback

These days, last names have little meaning. We might note a particularly attractive or ugly name, or, if a name has an exotic sound, might pause for a second to guess its country of origin. (“Angelina Jolie. Hmmm, that sounds French!”) And of course, we tend to perk up if someone shares our own name.

But once upon a time, last names could say a lot about you. That’s because, until comparatively recent times, last names were earned, not inherited. As a result, they could say where you came from (Jack London, G.K. Chesterton). They could tell who your father was (Ashlee Simpson, Jack Nicholson). They could show what you did for a living (James Taylor, Porter Waggoner). (I’m obviously using modern examples here; I’d be surprised to learn that James Taylor spends much time sewing shirts!)

Last names came about because, back in the distant day, people had large families, stayed in one place, and weren’t exactly imaginative in their choice of first names. So if you were talking about someone named Tom, it would avoid a lot of confusion if you referred to Tom the miller as opposed to Tom Donald’s son. And because trades were closely guarded and their skills tended to be passed down in families, if your father was a weaver, there was a good chance that you and your brothers and uncles and grandfathers were all weavers, too: Tom weaver, John weaver, Josh weaver, Jim weaver.

(To this day, a related tradition exists among the Amish, and for the same reason. If you have seven men named Jake Stoltzfus in the same community, they’ll be given nicknames to help identify them in conversation: Ruth’s Jake, Tomato Jake, Piney Road Jake, Big Jake, Horseshoe Jake, and so on.)

Naturally, these added names also helped identify people in church registers and on tax rolls, in wills and on censuses, and in other legal documents. Eventually, this need to keep track of the population brought about the formalization of last names; miller became Miller, John’s son became Johnson, and last names became inherited regardless of one’s profession, birthplace, or parentage.

Our friend Ben is fascinated by names. Even the name of my hero, the great Dr. Franklin, reveals something about his family: At one time, a franklin was an English landowner of non-noble birth, sort of a gentleman farmer.

Trade names especially tell us a lot about the kinds of work people did when their contributions were vital to their communities. They’re a wonderful link to a past that we have lost. Here’s a by-no-means exhaustive look at a few names that originated in professions: Miller, Smith, Weaver, Shoemaker, Hunter, Gardener, Sawyer, Fisher, Shepherd, Tanner, Falconer, Roper, Butler, Reeve, Porter, Cook, Tailor, Fletcher, Carter, Waggoner, Sumner, Tyler, Brewer, Cooper, Mason, Joyner, Carpenter, Farmer. Of course, because spelling was as flexible as naming, there are plenty of variations, too: Smythe, Cooke, Taylor, Shewmaker, Sheppard, Gardner, Faulkner, and so on.  

As you can see, one clue that a name originated as a trade name is if it ends in “-er” or “-or.” If your name ends in either, even if the profession it refers to isn’t obvious, you might want to look it up and see what you find. (For example, Chandler: a chandler was a candle-maker.) You could learn something fascinating about your family!     

Advertisement

Comments»

1. CeeCee - April 14, 2008

Oh my, seems our name simply means “servant or son of..”
I found this simple site for your readers to type in their last name and it give the history of said name.
http://www.ancestry.com/learn/facts/default.aspx

Wow, CeeCee, thanks so much! I’m sure no one will be able to resist checking it out!

2. Cinj - April 14, 2008

I too am very interested in names. They can tell us so much about our family history. Even though no “trades” have been passed down to me by my parents I have learned that ancestors have done many of my interests as professions. I know it may sound a bit silly to some, but I often wonder if some of that is passed on in our genetics.

Hmmm, interesting theory, Cinj! I know that at least five generations of my mother’s family were writers, and here I am, so you may have something there!

3. deb - April 14, 2008

Hey, that was a cool website CeeCee sent us to. Turns out our name basically means some from the town of the same name. Not too interesting. I will be playing with my maiden name and all my friends names.

Deb

Yes, I couldn’t resist rushing right over there, too!

4. Zoe - April 14, 2008

Hate to think what our ancestors got up to ….. it’s Lynch

Ha!!! Oh, dear, Zoe! But there’s probably some less gruesome interpretation as well, doubtless having to do with securing rope!

5. techsamaritan - April 15, 2008

My surname is open to debate. Some say “unknown origins”, but the most interesting theory would be that Jack the Strong invaded England with William the Conqueror. Those silly English could not pronounce his name, and thus was born Shack-le-ford, rather than Jacques le Forte. Personally, I prefer to be descended from “strong” lineage than simply be from the Shackleford Heath in Surrey, even if said Heath garnered it’s name from Conq. Bill’s sidekick.

That’s fascinating! One of my best friends in college was named Shackleford; I had no idea! Wish I could still get in touch–I’ll bet she’d love to know this!

6. techsamaritan - April 15, 2008

Speaking of names, William the Conquerer was known as William the Bastard before he took over the Isles. How is that for a name to be born with (think Bastardson).

Yes, my own Semmes/Simms ancestors arrived in Britain with the Conqueror, and I’ve always thought that his unfortunate parentage may have spurred him on to greatness. (Though it must be said that bastardy, as long as it was noble bastardy, didn’t carry quite the stigma it acquired later. Kings’ bastards were often made dukes in their own right, and the prefix “Fitz-” attached to any name indicated a bastard origin. Thus, any bastards of William’s would have been Fitzwilliams, and Fitzroy would have indicated a kingly sire.)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: